Charge Tenant For Carpet Replacement

In most cases landlords should not charge tenants for a standard carpet cleaning.

Charge tenant for carpet replacement.

Because carpet cleaning is part of the overall turnover costs that is usually covered by the landlords. The landlord should properly charge only 200 for the two years worth of life use that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet. One of the most common and fairest ways to calculate a tenant s responsibility is to charge the tenant for a portion of the total costs of replacing the carpet based off how much the carpet is damaged the carpet s life expectancy and how many years taken off the total life expectancy by the damage. The way to do this is to ask for quotes for removing the stain from two or three cleaning firms and charging the tenant the cheapest.

Once you learn whether or not you as a long term tenant will pay those costs you can. In disputes over security deposits courts have often considered basic carpet cleaning to be part of normal wear and tear. In this case the landlord should split the cost charging the tenant a fair cost for the repair but paying for the rest of the replacement charge. However you can only charge the depreciated cost of the carpet and there is the rub.

Figure the cost based on a 5 year lifespan for the carpet. Yes you certainly can charge the ex tenant reasonable repair replacement costs. 1 000 expected life of carpet. Carpet replacement is one of the most common problems tenants face with their security deposit.

Original cost of carpet. According to california law landlords can only charge tenants for carpet and paint under certain conditions. What is the reasonable life expectancy of the carpet carpet which apparently was already 6 years old. A security deposit is intended to be used by the landlord to do repairs on the rental unit that is caused by the tenant himself.

Using the same example with a life expectancy of nine years and if a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost 2 000 the landlord could properly charge only 222 22 for only one years worth of life use that would have.